Mote-Morris backers voice position late
By Lauren E. Stokes Leesburg ,Fla
I would like to respond to several points made in the editorial dated July 22, concerning the Mote-Morris house. As one of the "picketing preservationists," I would like to respond to the question about why only now protest? I feel the church's ultimate aims were not made clear or public until the article appeared in the Daily Commercial on July 1, that stated if the home were not moved it would be destroyed or razed. It has been our position as a group that we are first and foremost protest the destruction of this historic and architecturally significant home.
Since the statements made in early July were the first references of this kind, we felt the negotiations between the city of Leesburg and Morrison church officials had reached an impasse that the time was appropriate to voice our position. I would like to clarify that the city of Leesburg, since the purchase of the home by Morrison United Methodist Church,has in fact been in tough with state restoration and preservation officials. The city has worked diligently applying for restoration grants and in negotiations with the church.The city of Leesburg offered to purchase and pave the vacant lot across Main Street from the Mote-Morris house in exchange for the house. As stated in your editorial, the church has rejected this offer.
If we have made a mistake in our timing, it was based on erroneous assumptions, the most important being that the church would even consider the destruction of the home of such overwhelming importance for the community. I regret that I and others did not publicly support the Mote-Morris house earlier. I truly hope that if that has been a mistake that it does not have grave consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment